INFLUENCEMonths to result

Bodyguard Hypothesis

Women form alliances for protection

Problem it solves

lack of influence

Best for

Women seeking to understand their mate preferences and protection strategies

Not ideal for

Men who do not understand the importance of protection in female mate choice

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Bodyguard Hypothesis proposes that women form heterosexual pair-bonds with men in part to reduce their risk of sexual aggression from other men. This hypothesis suggests that women should be especially attracted to physically large and socially dominant men as mates, as they can provide protection from potential threats.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Women prioritize protection in their mate choice
  2. Physically formidable men can provide protection from potential threats
  3. Women's mate preferences are influenced by the risk of sexual aggression

Steps

4 steps
  1. Assess the risk of sexual aggression
    Women should assess the risk of sexual aggression in their environment and choose mates who can provide protection.
    Pro tipWomen should prioritize mates with physical and social dominance
    WarningWomen should be cautious of men who do not prioritize their protection and well-being
  2. Form alliances with protective men
    Women should form alliances with men who can provide protection, such as physically formidable men or men with high social status.
    Pro tipWomen should communicate their needs and boundaries clearly to their partners
    WarningWomen should be aware of the potential risks of relying solely on one partner for protection
  3. Cultivate female friendships
    Women should cultivate friendships with other women who can provide support and protection.
    Pro tipWomen should prioritize building strong social networks
    WarningWomen should be cautious of female friends who may not prioritize their protection and well-being
  4. Involve parents and kin in protection
    Women should involve their parents and kin in their protection strategy, as they can provide additional support and resources.
    Pro tipWomen should communicate their needs and boundaries clearly to their parents and kin
    WarningWomen should be aware of the potential risks of relying solely on their parents and kin for protection

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
The Yanomamo episode

Anthropologist Napoleon Chagnon described an episode in which a woman's husband was killed, and she was left vulnerable to sexual aggression. The woman's brother, who was physically formidable, provided protection and support.

OutcomeThe woman was able to avoid sexual aggression and find a new partner with the help of her brother.
The military example

A woman in the military described how she and her female colleagues would walk together in groups to avoid sexual aggression.

OutcomeThe women were able to avoid sexual aggression and feel safer in their environment.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Underestimating the risk of sexual aggression
Women may underestimate the risk of sexual aggression in their environment, leading to inadequate protection strategies.
Prioritizing short-term mating strategies
Women may prioritize short-term mating strategies over long-term protection, leading to increased vulnerability to sexual aggression.
Failing to communicate needs and boundaries
Women may fail to communicate their needs and boundaries clearly to their partners, leading to inadequate protection and support.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The Bodyguard Hypothesis was first proposed by Professors Sarah Mesnick and Margo Wilson, who argued that women's mate preferences for physically formidable men could be an adaptation to reduce the risk of sexual aggression.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
When Men Behave Badly The Hidden Roots of Sexual
David M Buss · 2020
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Influence →