Deadly Innovations Hypothesis

Evolution of human intelligence

Evolution Intelligence Innovation

Problem it solves

limiting beliefs

Best for

Researchers and students in evolutionary psychology

Not ideal for

General audience without background in psychology or evolution

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Deadly Innovations Hypothesis proposes that human intelligence evolved as a result of the need to adapt to novel hazards and technologies, rather than social competition. This hypothesis is supported by empirical evidence, including the correlation between intelligence and survival.

Core principles

3 total

Human intelligence evolved as a result of the need to adapt to novel hazards and technologies.
Intelligence is correlated with survival, suggesting that the ability to adapt to novel hazards and technologies drove the evolution of human intelligence.
The Deadly Innovations Hypothesis provides an alternative explanation for the evolution of human intelligence, distinct from the EDSC hypothesis.

Steps

2 steps

Understand the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis
The Deadly Innovations Hypothesis proposes that human intelligence evolved as a result of the need to adapt to novel hazards and technologies. This hypothesis is supported by empirical evidence, including the correlation between intelligence and survival.
Pro tipConsider the role of innovation and technology in shaping human behavior and cognition.
WarningBe aware of the potential limitations and criticisms of the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis.
Apply the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis to real-world scenarios
Consider how the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis can be applied to understand human behavior and cognition in various contexts, such as education, business, or social relationships.
Pro tipThink about how the ability to adapt to novel hazards and technologies can influence human behavior and decision-making.
WarningBe cautious of oversimplifying the complexity of human behavior and cognition.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Understand the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis and its principles.
Apply the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis to real-world scenarios.
Consider the role of innovation and technology in shaping human behavior and cognition.
Be aware of the potential limitations and criticisms of the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis.

Examples

1 cases

Adaptation to novel hazards and technologies

Humans have an evolved tendency to adapt to novel hazards and technologies, which can be observed in various contexts, such as the development of new tools or the response to natural disasters.

OutcomeThe ability to adapt to novel hazards and technologies can lead to increased survival and fitness, but also to new challenges and risks.

Common mistakes

2 traps

Overlooking the role of innovation and technology

Failing to consider the role of innovation and technology in shaping human behavior and cognition can lead to a lack of understanding of the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis and its implications.

Oversimplifying the complexity of human behavior and cognition

Human behavior and cognition are complex and multifaceted, and oversimplifying them can lead to a lack of understanding of the Deadly Innovations Hypothesis and its implications.