STRATEGYMonths to result

Dynamics and Wave Riding

Capture competitive advantage by riding waves of industry change

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Entrepreneurs and leaders in industries undergoing structural change or technological disruption

Not ideal for

Organizations in highly stable, mature industries with no foreseeable disruption

Overview

Why this framework exists

Rumelt argues that the greatest opportunities for strategic advantage come during periods of significant change - what he calls 'waves' of disruption. These can be driven by technology, regulation, customer preferences, or other forces. The strategist who can identify these waves early and position to ride them gains enormous advantage.

The key guideposts for wave-riding strategy include: rising fixed costs (creating scale advantages), deregulation or regulation changes, predictable biases in incumbent responses, and attractor states (the likely eventual equilibrium of the industry). Understanding these guideposts helps strategists anticipate how an industry will evolve and position accordingly.

Rumelt distinguishes this from mere trend-following. Wave riding requires understanding the fundamental forces driving change and having a clear view of where the industry is likely to settle, not just which direction it's currently moving.

Core principles

4 total
  1. The most powerful sources of competitive advantage emerge during periods of change
  2. Understanding attractor states helps predict where industries will settle
  3. Incumbents have predictable biases in how they respond to disruption
  4. Multiple waves can be ridden simultaneously if they're properly understood

Steps

4 steps
  1. Identify the Wave
    Look for fundamental shifts in technology, regulation, demographics, or customer behavior that are creating new dynamics in your industry.
    Pro tipFocus on underlying forces, not surface trends. Ask what is causing the trend, not just what the trend is.
  2. Map the Attractor State
    Determine where the industry is likely to settle after the wave of change passes. What will the new equilibrium look like?
    Pro tipThe attractor state is not always obvious from current trends. Look at analogous industries that went through similar transitions.
    WarningDon't assume the current trajectory will continue indefinitely.
  3. Anticipate Incumbent Response
    Predict how existing players will respond to the change. Incumbents typically underestimate disruption and respond too slowly.
    Pro tipIncumbents are often trapped by their existing assets, relationships, and business models.
  4. Position for the New Landscape
    Build capabilities and positioning that will be valuable in the post-disruption landscape, not just the current one.
    Pro tipThe best time to position is before the wave crests, when assets needed for the new landscape are still cheap.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Cisco Rides Three Waves

Cisco Systems identified and rode three interlinked waves: the shift from mainframes to client-server computing, the rise of the internet, and the convergence of voice and data networks. Each wave reinforced the others, and Cisco positioned itself at the nexus.

OutcomeCisco went from a small startup to one of the most valuable companies in the world.
The Microprocessor Wave

The microprocessor created a wave of change that disrupted the entire computer industry. Companies that understood this wave (Intel, Microsoft) captured enormous value. Those that didn't (DEC, IBM mainframes) lost it.

OutcomeAn entirely new industry structure emerged, with value shifting from hardware makers to software and chip companies.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Following Trends Instead of Understanding Forces
Trend followers arrive too late. Understanding the underlying forces allows you to position before the trend is obvious.
Assuming Stability Will Return to Old Patterns
After disruption, industries rarely return to their pre-disruption structure. The new equilibrium is different.
Overestimating Speed of Change
While change is inevitable, its speed can be overestimated. Premature positioning can be as costly as late positioning.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Rumelt developed these ideas by studying companies like Cisco Systems that achieved remarkable success by identifying and riding multiple waves of technological change. He found that the most successful companies in dynamic industries shared an ability to read the fundamental forces of change rather than just following surface trends.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Good Strategy/Bad Strategy:The difference and why it matters
Rumelt, Richard · 2011
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →