STRATEGYWeeks to result

Indirect Threat

Make them imagine the worst

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Situations where a direct threat is not feasible or desirable

Not ideal for

Situations where a quick and decisive victory is necessary

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Indirect Threat involves transmitting a threat indirectly, through a third party or through action, rather than directly. This can create a sense of uncertainty and fear in the opponent, making them imagine the worst possible outcome.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Transmit the threat indirectly, through a third party or through action
  2. Create a sense of uncertainty and fear in the opponent
  3. Make the opponent imagine the worst possible outcome

Steps

3 steps
  1. Assess the situation
    Determine the opponent's motivations and goals, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. Identify potential targets that the opponent values.
    Pro tipUse intelligence gathering and analysis to inform your assessment
    WarningBe careful not to underestimate the opponent's capabilities or overestimate your own
  2. Create an indirect threat
    Develop a plan to transmit the threat indirectly, through a third party or through action. Make it clear that any further aggression will result in consequences, without directly stating what those consequences will be.
    Pro tipUse a combination of diplomatic and economic measures to create an indirect threat
    WarningBe prepared for the opponent to test your resolve
  3. Maintain the indirect threat
    Continuously monitor the situation and adjust your indirect threat as necessary. Ensure that the opponent understands that you are committed to defending your interests, without directly stating what you will do.
    Pro tipUse a combination of military and non-military measures to maintain the indirect threat
    WarningBe prepared for the opponent to try to undermine your indirect threat

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
King Louis XI's diplomatic maneuvers

King Louis XI used an indirect threat to warn the Duke of Milan of the consequences of his actions, by transmitting the threat through a third party and creating a sense of uncertainty and fear.

OutcomeThe Duke of Milan became an obedient ally, and King Louis XI achieved his goals without having to use force
The psychological warfare of modern-day military operations

Modern-day military operations use indirect threats to create a sense of uncertainty and fear in the opponent, by transmitting the threat through action and making the opponent imagine the worst possible outcome.

OutcomeThe opponent becomes hesitant to attack, and the military operation achieves its goals without having to use direct force

Common mistakes

3 traps
Underestimating the opponent
Failing to accurately assess the opponent's capabilities and motivations can lead to an ineffective indirect threat
Overestimating your own capabilities
Failing to accurately assess your own capabilities can lead to an indirect threat that is not credible
Failing to maintain the indirect threat
Failing to continuously monitor the situation and adjust your indirect threat as necessary can lead to a loss of credibility

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The Indirect Threat has been used throughout history, from the diplomatic maneuvers of King Louis XI to the psychological warfare of modern-day military operations. The key is to create a perception of strength and resolve, without actually having to use force.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
The 33 Strategies of War
Robert Greene & Joost Elffers · 2006
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →