STRATEGYWeeks to result

Moving in Steps Framework

Breaking large actions into small ones can enhance credibility

Moving in StepsGame TheoryNegotiation
Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Negotiators, business leaders, and individuals seeking to enhance credibility

Not ideal for

Those who lack a strong understanding of game theory or are not willing to invest time in building relationships

Overview

Why this framework exists

Breaking large actions into small ones can enhance credibility. This framework explores how to use moving in steps to achieve desired outcomes in strategic interactions.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Breaking large actions into small ones can enhance credibility.
  2. Moving in steps can be used to achieve desired outcomes in strategic interactions.
  3. The other party's perception of the steps can influence their behavior.

Steps

3 steps
  1. Assess the situation
    Evaluate the situation to determine the best approach for using moving in steps.
    Pro tipConsider the other party's perception of the steps and their potential behavior.
    WarningPoor assessment can lead to negative outcomes.
  2. Break large actions into small ones
    Break large actions into small ones to enhance credibility.
    Pro tipBe strategic in breaking large actions into small ones to achieve desired outcomes.
    WarningFailing to break large actions into small ones can lead to a lack of credibility and negative outcomes.
  3. Use moving in steps to achieve desired outcomes
    Use moving in steps to achieve desired outcomes in strategic interactions.
    Pro tipBe cautious in using moving in steps to avoid negative outcomes.
    WarningPoor use of moving in steps can lead to negative outcomes.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Negotiation example

A negotiator uses moving in steps to enhance credibility and achieve a desired outcome.

OutcomeThe negotiator achieves a favorable outcome due to the effective use of moving in steps.
Business example

A company uses moving in steps to achieve a competitive advantage and enhance credibility.

OutcomeThe company achieves a competitive advantage due to the effective use of moving in steps.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Poor assessment
Poor assessment can lead to negative outcomes.
Failing to break large actions into small ones
Failing to break large actions into small ones can lead to a lack of credibility and negative outcomes.
Poor use of moving in steps
Poor use of moving in steps can lead to negative outcomes.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The concept of moving in steps in game theory is rooted in the idea that breaking large actions into small ones can enhance credibility. This framework builds on the work of game theorists such as Thomas Schelling.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life
Dixit, Avinash K. · 2008
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →
STRIntroducing Uncertainty to Game TheoryUncertainty in game theorySTRWinner's Curse FrameworkAvoid overbiddingSTRDrone and Queen FrameworkSacrificing for success