Recalibration Theory of Anger
Anger as a strategy for resolving social conflicts
The Recalibration Theory of Anger proposes that feeling and expressing anger functions to increase the value that the target of your anger places on your welfare. This theory suggests that individuals with a superior ability to inflict costs and confer benefits should be more prone to anger.
- Anger is a strategy for resolving social conflicts
- Individuals with a superior ability to inflict costs and confer benefits should be more prone to anger
- Physical strength and attractiveness are key components of the ability to inflict costs and confer benefits
- Assess your ability to inflict costs and confer benefitsConsider your physical strength, attractiveness, and social status. These factors can influence your ability to inflict costs and confer benefits, and thus your proneness to anger.Pro tipBe honest with yourself about your strengths and weaknessesWarningOverestimating your abilities can lead to unnecessary conflict
- Identify situations that trigger angerReflect on the situations that make you feel angry. Are they related to social conflicts or perceived injustices?Pro tipKeep a journal to track your emotions and identify patternsWarningAvoid blaming others for your anger
- Develop strategies for resolving social conflictsConsider alternative strategies for resolving social conflicts, such as negotiation or compromise. These strategies can help you achieve your goals without resorting to anger.Pro tipPractice active listening and empathyWarningAvoid escalating conflicts with aggressive behavior
A physically strong man is more likely to use anger to resolve a social conflict, as his physical strength gives him an advantage in inflicting costs and conferring benefits.
The theory was developed by Sell and his colleagues, who tested its predictions in several studies. They found that physically strong men and physically attractive women were more prone to anger and had greater success in resolving social conflicts.