STRATEGYMonths to result

Strategic Alternatives in Decline Framework

Strategic alternatives in declining industries

Problem it solves

declining industries

Best for

Companies facing declining industries

Not ideal for

Companies in growing industries

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Strategic Alternatives in Decline Framework identifies the strategic alternatives available to companies in declining industries. The framework helps companies understand the implications of different strategic alternatives and develop strategies to maximize value.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Companies face significant challenges when competing in declining industries
  2. The strategic alternatives available to companies in declining industries can have significant implications for strategic decisions
  3. Understanding the implications of different strategic alternatives is crucial for maximizing value

Steps

3 steps
  1. Identify the strategic alternatives available
    Determine the strategic alternatives available to the company, such as leadership, niche, harvest, or divest. This will help companies understand the implications of different strategic alternatives and develop targeted strategies to maximize value.
    Pro tipConsider the company's overall strategy and goals when identifying the strategic alternatives
    WarningFailing to identify the correct strategic alternatives can lead to poor strategic decisions
  2. Assess the impact of each strategic alternative
    Evaluate the impact of each strategic alternative on the company's ability to maximize value. Consider the potential costs and benefits of each alternative, as well as the potential consequences of failing to maximize value.
    Pro tipUse data and analysis to assess the impact of each strategic alternative
    WarningUnderestimating the impact of each strategic alternative can lead to poor strategic decisions
  3. Develop a strategy to maximize value
    Based on the strategic alternatives available and their impact, develop a strategy to maximize value. This may involve investing in new technologies, divesting assets, or developing new business models.
    Pro tipConsider multiple scenarios and contingency plans when developing a strategy
    WarningFailing to develop a effective strategy can lead to failure to maximize value

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

1 cases
General Mills' divestment of its commodity flour business

General Mills divested its commodity flour business due to declining demand and high exit barriers. The company developed a strategy to maximize value, including investing in new technologies and divesting assets.

OutcomeGeneral Mills was able to exit the industry and focus on more profitable businesses

Common mistakes

3 traps
Underestimating the impact of strategic alternatives
Companies may underestimate the impact of strategic alternatives, leading to poor strategic decisions and failure to maximize value
Failing to identify the correct strategic alternatives
Companies may fail to identify the correct strategic alternatives, leading to ineffective strategies to maximize value
Not developing a strategy to maximize value
Companies may not develop a strategy to maximize value, leading to failure to maximize value

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The framework was developed by Michael E. Porter as part of his work on competitive strategy. It is based on the idea that companies face significant challenges when competing in declining industries, and that the strategic alternatives available to them can have significant implications for their strategic decisions.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Competitive Strategy
Michael E. Porter · 1980
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →