STRATEGYMonths to result

Tapered Integration Framework

Integrate partially to balance benefits and costs

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Firms seeking to balance integration benefits and costs

Not ideal for

Firms with low integration needs or high costs

Overview

Why this framework exists

Tapered integration involves partial integration to balance the benefits of integration with the costs and risks.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Partial integration can balance benefits and costs
  2. Tapered integration can reduce risks and costs while achieving some benefits
  3. Firms must consider the degree of integration needs and costs when deciding on tapered integration

Steps

3 steps
  1. Assess Integration Needs
    Evaluate the level of integration needs and the potential benefits and costs.
    Pro tipConsider the industry's competitive landscape and the firm's position within it
    WarningIgnoring integration needs can lead to poor decisions
  2. Evaluate Tapered Integration Benefits
    Weigh the potential benefits of tapered integration, including reduced costs and risks, and improved bargaining power.
    Pro tipConsider the firm's ability to achieve benefits through partial integration
    WarningOverestimating benefits can lead to poor decisions
  3. Consider Alternative Strategies
    Evaluate alternative strategies, such as full integration or no integration, to achieve similar benefits.
    Pro tipConsider the risks and costs associated with each strategy
    WarningIgnoring alternative strategies can lead to suboptimal decisions

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

1 cases
Major Automobile Companies

The major automobile companies have used tapered integration to achieve benefits while reducing costs and risks.

OutcomeSuccessful integration

Common mistakes

3 traps
Ignoring Integration Needs
Failing to assess integration needs can lead to poor decisions
Overestimating Benefits
Overestimating the benefits of tapered integration can lead to poor decisions
Ignoring Alternative Strategies
Failing to consider alternative strategies can lead to suboptimal decisions

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Companies like the major automobile companies and international oil companies have successfully used tapered integration to achieve benefits while reducing costs and risks.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Competitive Strategy
Michael E. Porter · 1980
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →