FINANCEOngoing practice88% confidence

The Bond Ladder for Retirement De-Risking

Stagger bond maturities to fund living expenses and protect against sequencing risk.

Problem it solves

sequencing risk in early retirement

Best for

Investors within 5 years of retirement, or in early retirement, who want to insulate against early-retirement crashes

Not ideal for

Young accumulators with 20+ year horizons where 100% equity dominates

Overview

Why this framework exists

A Bond Ladder is a portfolio of single bonds with staggered maturity dates. Each year, one 'rung' matures and provides cash; you then either spend it (if retired) or roll it into a new long-dated rung (if still building). Nakisa's specific recipe: take annual living expenses, multiply by three, and build a 3-year ladder starting 5 years before retirement, running it through the first few years of retirement.

The purpose is sequencing risk mitigation. A market crash in the first few years of retirement is uniquely damaging because withdrawals during a drawdown permanently shrink the portfolio's recovery capacity. The ladder gives the retiree 3 years of expenses they can live on while equities recover, instead of being forced to sell stocks at the bottom.

Unlike a bond fund, a ladder gives total certainty: you know which rung pays when, and how much. It is mechanically simple to maintain — a few decisions per year.

Core principles

5 total
  1. Sequencing risk — not average return — is the binding constraint in early retirement.
  2. Three years of cash buys time for equities to recover from a normal crash.
  3. Each rung of the ladder is a single bond held to maturity, not a fund.
  4. Build the ladder before you need it; you cannot build it during a crash.
  5. Stop replenishing rungs once you are deep enough into retirement that longevity > drawdown risk.

Steps

6 steps
  1. Calculate annual living expenses
    Be honest about what you actually spend, including discretionary. This number anchors the entire ladder size.
    Pro tipUse the last 12 months of bank statements, not your aspirational budget.
  2. Multiply by three to size the ladder
    Three years of expenses is Nakisa's chosen buffer — long enough to cover most equity recoveries (2008 took ~7 years; 2020 took months) but small enough not to drag returns.
  3. Build the ladder 5 years before retirement
    Buy three single gilts maturing in years 1, 2, and 3 of retirement. Use the broker ticker system (e.g. T26, T27, T28) to pick exact maturities.
  4. Roll matured rungs into new 3-year gilts
    While still working, when a rung matures, buy a new 3-year gilt to extend the ladder. This is the 'conveyor belt' phase.
  5. At retirement, spend matured rungs
    Once retired, the matured bond funds the year's expenses. Equities continue to grow untouched.
    Pro tipIf equities are up that year, also sell some equities to refill a future rung; if down, let the ladder carry you.
  6. Stop replenishing 2 years into retirement
    Once the worst sequencing-risk window passes, let the ladder run down and shift back toward equities for longevity.
    WarningDon't extend the ladder forever — long-run drag on returns becomes the new risk.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

3 cases
Nakisa's own plan

Five years before retirement he plans to set up a 3-year ladder using UK gilts, run it through the first two years of retirement, then stop replenishing.

Outcome100% equity for life, with sequencing-risk protection in the danger zone.
The 2008 retiree case

A 2007 retiree drawing from a 100% equity portfolio would have been devastated by 2008-09. With a 3-year ladder, they could have lived off bonds while equities recovered ~7 years later.

OutcomePortfolio longevity preserved despite worst-case sequencing.
US retirees with municipal-bond ladders

Nakisa notes Americans are 'all over' bond ladders, often built with tax-exempt municipal bonds and US Treasuries on Fidelity's automated ladder builder.

OutcomeMainstream tooling makes laddering routine in the US — UK is catching up.

Common mistakes

4 traps
Building the ladder too late
Trying to construct it during a market crash is the worst time — yields may have spiked and you may be selling equities at the bottom to fund it.
Using a bond fund instead of single bonds
A fund has no maturity date — you lose the certainty that defines the ladder. You're back to mark-to-market risk.
Sizing the ladder by emotion, not math
Some retirees keep 10+ years in bonds because crashes scare them. The drag on terminal wealth is enormous.
Ignoring tax wrappers
UK gilt capital gains are tax-free outside ISAs/SIPPs. Hold corporate bonds inside wrappers, gilts wherever convenient.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Nakisa shared this with his PensionCraft community as his personal retirement plan. His insight came from analysing 'sequencing risk': a crash near retirement shaves years off portfolio longevity, while the same-sized crash at age 90 is irrelevant. The ladder is his answer to the question 'how do I stay 100% equity for life without being forced to sell at the bottom?'

Source

Traced to primary
Source · PODCAST
The Right Way To Use Bonds
Ramin Nakisa · 2024
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Finance →