FINANCEMonths to result92% confidence

The Everything Code

Sovereign debt forces an 11% annual debasement hurdle only crypto reliably clears

Problem it solves

Why savers feel poorer despite working harder

Best for

Long-term investors making asset allocation decisions who want to understand why cash savings destroy wealth and which asset classes genuinely beat the debasement rate

Not ideal for

Short-term traders or investors who need high liquidity and cannot hold through 70-80% drawdowns

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Everything Code starts from a structural reality: since 2008, virtually every major government hit 100%+ debt-to-GDP. The US now sits at approximately 380% of GDP in combined sovereign, corporate, and household debt. At these levels, governments cannot allow interest rates to normalize without triggering cascading defaults, so they are compelled to periodically inject liquidity and suppress real rates.

Every cycle of liquidity injection debases the currency. Raoul's calculation is that scarce assets appreciate at approximately 8% per year purely from debasement, plus roughly 3% inflation, producing an 11% annual hurdle rate. Any investment that does not beat 11% per year is making you poorer in real terms, even if the nominal number looks positive.

Dividing every asset class by that 11% hurdle reveals that the S&P 500 returns roughly 11% per year — effectively zero real return — real estate is similarly flat in real terms, and gold has historically underperformed the hurdle. Only technology (NASDAQ at ~18%/year) and crypto (Bitcoin at 145%/year, Ethereum at 160%/year, Solana at 250%/year) have reliably outperformed. The framework collapses the entire investment universe into two viable positions for most investors.

Core principles

5 total
  1. Governments with 100%+ debt-to-GDP cannot allow real rate normalization without triggering systemic defaults, so liquidity injection is structurally compelled, not optional.
  2. Each liquidity cycle debases the purchasing power of fiat by approximately 8% per year for holders of scarce assets, creating a non-negotiable 11% annual investment hurdle when combined with inflation.
  3. Any asset class that does not produce returns above 11% per year is a wealth-destroying vehicle in real terms, regardless of nominal performance.
  4. Only two asset classes have historically and consistently beaten the debasement hurdle: technology (NASDAQ) and crypto — and crypto beats it by an order of magnitude.
  5. The 4-year debt refinancing cycle creates predictable windows of maximum crypto drawdown that are mechanically driven buying opportunities, not fundamental deterioration signals.

Steps

7 steps
  1. Calculate your personal debasement hurdle
    Start by accepting that your fiat savings face an approximately 11% annual real erosion (8% debasement + 3% inflation). This is not a forecast — it is a mechanical consequence of global debt levels. Any investment plan that does not explicitly beat this hurdle is a loss plan.
    Pro tipUse Raoul's framing: 'Your future self is getting poorer by 11% every year.' Make it visceral, not abstract.
  2. Audit every current holding against the 11% hurdle
    Take each asset class you currently hold and look up its historical annualized return. S&P 500 at ~11%/year breaks even. Real estate breaks even or slightly worse. Gold underperforms. NASDAQ is marginally positive at ~18%/year. Only crypto has historically delivered returns that dwarf the hurdle.
    WarningNominal gains feel like wealth creation. The hurdle framework reframes them as treadmill running — you're moving but not getting ahead.
  3. Allocate to the two viable asset classes
    The framework leaves two investable options: NASDAQ for those who cannot tolerate crypto volatility, and crypto for those who can. Raoul's recommended crypto allocation is 80-90% in BTC, ETH, and SOL — the three assets with the longest return track records — and maximum 10% in speculative positions.
    Pro tipRaoul's personal rule: 'Knock your socks off on those three.' Diversifying into altcoins beyond the top three adds noise without proportionally adding return.
  4. DCA every month regardless of price
    Dollar-cost average into your allocation on a fixed monthly schedule regardless of market conditions. The 4-year cycle means you will buy both highs and lows. The average entry across a cycle has historically still massively outperformed the debasement hurdle.
    Pro tipSet an automated buy and do not look at the price. The worst investors Raoul has observed are those who watch prices daily.
  5. Hold through 70-80% drawdowns
    Every 4-year cycle includes a drawdown of 70-80% in crypto assets. These are mechanically predictable — they occur when the debt-refinancing cycle tightens liquidity before the next injection. Selling during these drawdowns converts paper losses into permanent ones and eliminates your position for the recovery.
    Pro tipReframe drawdowns as sales on the best-performing assets in history. Raoul calls 80% drops 'features, not bugs.'
    WarningLeverage amplifies drawdowns. A 70% drop in an unleveraged position is survivable; a 70% drop in a 3x leveraged position is a wipeout.
  6. Add maximum capital at cycle lows
    Every major drawdown — particularly those coinciding with macro stress events like the 2020 pandemic crash — represents the maximum capital deployment window. Raoul's own best entries came from buying the 50% selloff in March 2020 and the subsequent bear market of 2022.
    Pro tipThe 4-year cycle is driven by debt refinancing schedules, not sentiment. When macro fear peaks and BTC/ETH drop 70-80%, the refinancing wave is near bottom.
  7. Define a lifestyle bank target and take partial profits at cycle highs
    Identify the capital amount that funds your lifestyle security — housing, emergency reserves, near-term expenses. At cycle highs, sell enough to fund that lifestyle bank. The remainder stays in crypto for the next cycle. This prevents being forced to sell at lows for liquidity.
    Pro tipRaoul's frame: figure out what number lets you sleep at night and fund that from cycle-high profits. Everything above that threshold stays invested for 2032-2034.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

3 cases
NASDAQ vs Bitcoin since 2012

Raoul calculated the relative performance of the NASDAQ — the best-performing traditional asset class over the same period — against Bitcoin since 2012. Both are technology bets, both benefit from the same Exponential Age tailwinds.

OutcomeNASDAQ is down 99.97% versus Bitcoin since 2012. The debasement hurdle framework explains why: Bitcoin at 145%/year vs NASDAQ at 18%/year compounds into an almost complete destruction of the NASDAQ's relative purchasing power over a decade.
Generational wealth destruction from fiat holding (1983 vs 2024 cohort)

Raoul compared two 30-year-old cohorts: those who came of age in 1983 and those in 2024. In 1983, 85% lived with partners, 80% were married, 60% had kids, 50% owned homes — all on a single income. In 2024, those figures are 64%, 47%, 32%, and 32% respectively. House price multiples to income moved from 3.5x to 8-10x.

OutcomeThe collapse is not caused by laziness or spending — it is caused by 40 years of fiat debasement compounding against wages. The generation that held cash and bonds and 'safe' assets systematically had their wealth extracted. The Everything Code framework identifies this mechanism and provides the exit ramp.
Raoul's personal 2020 pandemic crash deployment

In March 2020, when Bitcoin dropped approximately 50% in a single week during the COVID crash, Raoul identified it as a maximum capital deployment moment aligned with the 4-year cycle framework. Despite the macro panic, he bought the drawdown rather than sold.

OutcomeBitcoin subsequently ran from the ~$4,000-5,000 crash low to ~$69,000 within 18 months — a roughly 14x return for cycle-low buyers. The framework's prediction that liquidity injection would follow the macro stress event proved correct within weeks, with the Fed announcing unlimited QE.

Common mistakes

5 traps
Treating nominal returns as real wealth creation
Investors celebrate 10% stock market returns without accounting for the 11% debasement hurdle. The result is the illusion of wealth creation while real purchasing power stagnates or declines. The mistake is using nominal benchmarks rather than debasement-adjusted ones.
Selling during 70-80% crypto drawdowns
Drawdowns in crypto feel catastrophic but are structurally predictable features of the 4-year liquidity cycle. Selling during them converts temporary paper losses into permanent losses and ensures you miss the recovery that has historically followed every major drawdown within 1-2 years.
Over-diversifying into altcoins beyond BTC, ETH, SOL
Spreading across dozens of altcoins feels like risk management but actually increases noise without proportionally increasing expected returns. The three dominant assets have the longest return track records and the deepest institutional liquidity. Speculative positions should be capped at 10% of the crypto allocation.
Using leverage in a high-volatility asset class
Crypto's 70-80% drawdowns make leverage an almost certain path to forced liquidation. Raoul's one rule is 'don't lose tokens' — leverage means a drawdown that would otherwise be survivable eliminates your entire position, removing you from the recovery.
Holding cash or short-duration bonds as a 'safe' alternative
Cash feels safe but loses 11% of purchasing power per year against the debasement hurdle. Investors who fled crypto at the 2022 lows and held cash preserved nominal value while losing real value, then missed the 2023-2024 recovery.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Raoul Pal developed The Everything Code after observing the structural shift in 2008, when major governments globally took on debts that exceeded 100% of GDP for the first time in peacetime. Watching the subsequent decade of suppressed rates and periodic QE rounds, he identified a mechanical 4-year refinancing cycle: governments issued debt with 3-5 year maturities in 2008, which created a rolling wave of refinancing events requiring liquidity injections roughly every four years to prevent credit crises.

The framework was stress-tested publicly through Real Vision and Global Macro Investor across the 2017, 2020, and 2024 crypto cycles. Raoul noted that the cycle's predictability comes from the mathematics of debt rollover schedules, not from central bank discretion — which makes it unusually reliable as a macro timing tool.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · PODCAST
The Investing & Crypto Expert: We Only Have 6 Years Until Everything Changes!
Raoul Pal · 2024
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Finance →