FINANCEWeeks to result85% confidence

The Memorisable Portfolio Rule

If you can't recite every fund you own from memory, your portfolio is too complex.

Problem it solves

portfolio sprawl and unmanaged complexity

Best for

DIY investors with sprawling fund lists across ISAs, SIPPs and GIAs who keep adding 'one more' fund.

Not ideal for

Institutional or HNW investors who need bespoke factor tilts, tax-loss harvesting, or structured products.

Overview

Why this framework exists

Nakisa's personal heuristic: he must be able to memorise every fund he owns and recite them from memory. In practice this caps him at around five funds. The rule is not about the number — it is about a forcing function for understanding.

Complexity does not break portfolios; behaviour does. The more moving parts you own, the more you have to monitor, rebalance, and explain to yourself in a crisis. Each extra fund increases the chance you panic-sell something you don't fully understand.

With modern global all-cap and global aggregate bond funds, two products can give world-wide stock and bond exposure. The case for owning twenty is almost always narrative-driven, not structural.

Core principles

4 total
  1. Every fund you cannot name from memory is a fund you cannot manage in a crisis.
  2. Diversification is a property of holdings, not of count.
  3. More funds = more rebalancing decisions = more chances to err.
  4. Two global funds (equity + bonds) already give world-wide diversification.

Steps

5 steps
  1. List every fund you own across every account
    Pull a single list across ISA, SIPP, GIA, workplace pension and any legacy accounts. Most investors are surprised how long the list is once consolidated.
  2. Try to recite the list from memory
    Close the laptop and write out every fund and roughly what it does. Every fund you cannot recall is a candidate for removal.
    Pro tipIf you can't explain a fund's role in one sentence, that is a stronger signal than forgetting its name.
  3. Identify overlaps and duplicates
    Plot the price history of any two funds you own — if they crash together and rally together (March 2020 is a clean stress test), you are paying twice for the same exposure.
    Pro tipA global index already contains REITs and US large caps — adding S&P 500 and a REIT fund on top is almost always doubling up.
  4. Collapse to a target count you can name
    Pick a count — 2, 3 or 5 funds — that you can recite. Map each remaining fund to a specific job (global equity, global bonds, money market, REIT). Sell the rest.
    WarningWatch CGT in unwrapped accounts — phase the consolidation to use annual allowances.
  5. Set a 'no new fund' default
    Make adding a new fund a conscious decision: it must replace an existing fund or fill a documented gap. Default to no.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Daniel's ISA + SIPP question

A 21-year-old listener had a global all-cap fund in both his ISA and SIPP and asked if it was redundant. Nakisa said no — if both have the same long-term goal and time horizon, owning the same global fund in both wrappers is exactly right.

OutcomeBuying two different funds (e.g. a Vanguard LifeStrategy AND a Target Retirement) often gives near-identical returns at higher complexity, with no diversification benefit.
Overlapping S&P 500 + green energy fund

Nakisa repeatedly sees investors hold a global index, an S&P 500 ETF, and an S&P 500 clean-energy ETF together. Because each contains the largest US companies, the combination is a heavy concentrated bet on US mega-caps.

OutcomeThe fix is to plot all three through March 2020 — they fall together, confirming overlap, and two of the three can be cut.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Buying the same exposure twice
Holding a global index AND the S&P 500 AND a clean-energy S&P fund layers US large-cap on US large-cap on US large-cap — you are concentrated, not diversified.
Confusing fund count with diversification
Twenty funds tracking similar assets is less diversified than one global all-cap. Diversification is about correlations, not totals.
Adding funds because of a story
Themed funds (AI, innovation, EVs) tend to be bought after a strong run, then disappoint. The narrative is the symptom — overpaying is the damage.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

After years running a complex, asset-allocation-style portfolio that mirrored his strategist habits, Nakisa was challenged by a member of his community to simplify. He set himself the rule that every fund had to be memorisable — which naturally collapsed the portfolio to about five holdings.

The rule emerged as a counter to the industry default of constantly adding products: 'remember that when you complicate things it just makes it more breakable, and what breaks it is your behavior.'

Source

Traced to primary
Source · PODCAST
The One Thing You Need To Invest In
Ramin Nakisa · 2024
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Finance →