STRATEGYWeeks to result

To Lead or Not to Lead

When to follow and when to lead

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Business leaders, entrepreneurs, and innovators

Not ideal for

Those who are risk-averse or prefer to follow established protocols

Overview

Why this framework exists

This framework helps individuals to determine when to lead and when to follow, considering the potential risks and benefits of each approach. It involves analyzing the situation, considering the potential outcomes, and making an informed decision.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Leading can be beneficial, but it also involves risks and potential drawbacks.
  2. Following can be a viable strategy, especially when the leader is uncertain or inexperienced.
  3. It's essential to consider the potential outcomes and make an informed decision.

Steps

3 steps
  1. Analyze the situation
    Consider the potential risks and benefits of leading or following.
    Pro tipTake into account the experience and expertise of the leader and the potential outcomes.
    WarningDon't underestimate the potential risks of leading or the benefits of following.
  2. Consider alternative scenarios
    Think about different possible outcomes and how they might affect the decision.
    Pro tipUse scenario planning to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities.
    WarningAvoid getting caught up in a single scenario or outcome.
  3. Make an informed decision
    Use the analysis to make a decision, taking into account the potential risks and benefits.
    Pro tipConsider seeking input from others and weighing the pros and cons.
    WarningAvoid making a decision based on intuition or emotion alone.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Dell's strategy in the personal computer market

Dell's decision to follow and bring standardized technology to the mass market helped the company to succeed and gain market share.

OutcomeDell's strategy allowed the company to become a leader in the personal computer market.
Procter & Gamble's innovation in the diaper market

Procter & Gamble's decision to follow Kimberly-Clark's innovation of resealable diaper tape helped the company to recapture its market position.

OutcomeProcter & Gamble's strategy allowed the company to regain its leadership in the diaper market.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Underestimating the risks of leading
Failing to consider the potential drawbacks of leading, such as the risk of failure or the burden of responsibility.
Overestimating the benefits of following
Believing that following is always the safest or most beneficial approach, without considering the potential risks or missed opportunities.
Failing to consider alternative scenarios
Not thinking about different possible outcomes and how they might affect the decision.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The concept of to lead or not to lead is rooted in game theory and the analysis of strategic decision-making.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life
Dixit, Avinash K. · 2008
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →