STRATEGYMonths to result

Deterrence and Compellence Framework

Influence others through threats and promises

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Individuals and organizations seeking to influence others through threats and promises

Not ideal for

Those who prefer to use coercion or force

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Deterrence and Compellence Framework involves using threats and promises to influence others and achieve a desired outcome. This can be achieved by establishing a response rule, such as a threat or promise, to induce others to take a desired action.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Use threats and promises to influence others
  2. Establish a response rule
  3. Ensure credibility of the threat or promise

Steps

3 steps
  1. Identify the Desired Outcome
    Understand what you want to achieve and what action you want others to take.
    Pro tipConsider the potential responses of others to the threat or promise
    WarningBe aware of the potential risks and consequences of making a threat or promise
  2. Choose a Threat or Promise
    Select a threat or promise that will induce others to take the desired action.
    Pro tipConsider the potential costs and benefits of the threat or promise
    WarningBe aware of the potential drawbacks and unintended consequences of the threat or promise
  3. Establish a Response Rule
    Communicate the threat or promise clearly and establish a response rule.
    Pro tipConsider the potential responses of others to the threat or promise
    WarningBe prepared for potential consequences and responses from others

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
The United States' Threat

The United States threatens to respond with nuclear weapons if the Soviet Union attacks any NATO country.

OutcomeThe Soviet Union is deterred from attacking any NATO country.
The Bank Robber's Threat

A bank robber threatens to kill the employees if his demands are not met.

OutcomeThe employees are compelled to comply with the robber's demands.

Common mistakes

2 traps
Failure to Consider Potential Responses
Not considering the potential responses of others to the threat or promise can lead to unintended consequences.
Insufficient Credibility
If the threat or promise is not credible, it may not be effective in achieving the desired outcome.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The concept of deterrence and compellence has been used throughout history, with examples such as the United States threatening to respond with nuclear weapons if the Soviet Union attacked any NATO country. Game theory has formalized this concept, with Thomas Schelling developing the idea of changing the game as a central theme of game theory.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life
Dixit, Avinash K. · 2008
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →