FINANCEWeeks to result80% confidence

Diversification for Unknown Unknowns

Diversify because the worst risks are the ones you can't name.

Problem it solves

false confidence from research-driven concentration

Best for

Long-term investors managing personal portfolios, especially those drawn to concentration.

Not ideal for

High-conviction concentrated investors who actively want maximum idiosyncratic exposure.

Overview

Why this framework exists

Diversification for Unknown Unknowns reframes diversification as humility, not laziness. Coffin distinguishes known unknowns — risks you can list — from unknown unknowns: forces that aren't even on your radar yet (consumer-taste shifts, technological surprises, regulatory whiplash). Even perfect company research can't immunise you against these.

The framework holds that diversification's primary job is not optimising expected return but absorbing the surprises that no amount of due diligence reveals. It also opens the door to asymmetric upside — Apple's iPhone moment was an unknown unknown that quietly built into one of the largest products in history.

It's a counterweight to the active community's concentration ethos: even if you can pick winners, the world can override you in ways you didn't model.

Core principles

5 total
  1. There are known unknowns and unknown unknowns; only the second require true diversification.
  2. Even excellent research cannot price unknown unknowns.
  3. Diversification protects from idiosyncratic blow-ups and exposes you to surprise upside.
  4. Concentration earns its keep only when you can defend why this risk is worth missing other opportunities.
  5. Position sizing should reflect what you don't know, not just what you do.

Steps

5 steps
  1. Catalogue your known unknowns
    For each holding, list the risks you can name — competitive, regulatory, financial. This sets the floor of what your research already covers.
  2. Acknowledge unknown unknowns explicitly
    Write a line in every thesis admitting which categories of risk you can't enumerate (consumer taste shifts, geopolitical regime changes, new technologies). This forces humility into sizing.
    Pro tipUse prior cycles' surprises (smartphone, ZIRP, COVID) to remind yourself how invisible they were ex-ante.
  3. Set a diversification floor
    Define a minimum number of names, sectors, or geographies. The floor enforces diversification before any specific thesis.
    WarningDon't let a great-looking thesis push you below the floor.
  4. Cap idiosyncratic exposure
    Set per-position and per-theme caps that limit damage if a single company is blindsided. Apply the same caps to themes (AI, weed, crypto) as to single names.
  5. Re-test after major surprises
    When something genuinely unexpected happens, audit which holdings were exposed and whether the framework absorbed it as designed. Adjust caps accordingly.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
iPhone as positive unknown unknown

When the iPhone launched it was mocked and compared unfavourably to cheaper Nokia handsets. Few investors modelled it becoming Apple's biggest product, yet diversified holders captured the windfall.

OutcomeSurprise upside captured without a perfect forecast.
Consumer-taste shifts

Coffin notes that even with perfect company research, an unforeseen shift in consumer sentiment can revolutionise how a company performs. Concentration leaves no buffer.

OutcomeDiversification cushioned thesis-breaking surprises he and his peers couldn't have priced.

Common mistakes

4 traps
Equating research depth with risk control
Believing more analysis on a single name is a substitute for diversification. Unknown unknowns make that false.
Concentrating on themes
Holding many names that all rise and fall with the same narrative; diversification by ticker, not by risk factor.
Skipping geographic diversification
Treating the S&P 500 as the world; an active choice to exclude the rest of the global economy.
Ignoring the upside of surprises
Forgetting that diversification also exposes you to positive unknowns like Apple's iPhone arc.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Coffin sits inside an active-management firm and engages directly with the concentration-vs-diversification debate. His position came from watching how often external shocks — consumer shifts, tech revolutions, geopolitical events — overturned otherwise solid theses, and how often unknown upside (the iPhone) emerged from products that were initially mocked.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · PODCAST
This Is How You Build Wealth
Richard Coffin (The Plain Bagel) · 2024
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Finance →