COMMUNICATIONWeeks to result

Notes Day: Company-Wide Collective Problem Solving

Halt production for a day so every employee can propose solutions to real problems

Problem it solves

poor communication

Best for

["Organizations where employees have stopped speaking up despite open-door policies","Companies facing multiple interconnected problems with no single silver-bullet solution","Leaders who sense cultural stagnation or self-censoring in their teams","Growing organizations where new hires feel inhibited by the company's success and reputation"]

Not ideal for

["Very small startups where constant informal conversation already surfaces all ideas","Organizations in existential crisis where a full day of production stoppage is unaffordable","Teams where management has no intention of acting on employee suggestions"]

Overview

Why this framework exists

Notes Day was Pixar's response to a convergence of three crises: rising production costs, external economic pressure, and the discovery that too many employees were self-censoring. Catmull recognized that no single big idea would solve these interconnected problems, so instead of imposing top-down solutions, Pixar shut down production for an entire day and invited every employee to participate in structured problem-solving sessions.

The premise was radical: halt all revenue-generating work and trust that the collective intelligence of 1,200 employees, when given permission and structure, would generate better solutions than leadership alone could devise. Employees at every level proposed session topics, facilitated discussions, and generated actionable recommendations. The event itself was a powerful signal that leadership genuinely valued input from everywhere.

Notes Day worked because it was built on the foundation of Pixar's existing cultural principles: candor, ownership, and the belief that good ideas can come from anywhere. But it also addressed the specific problem that those principles were eroding. As Pixar grew, newer employees were reluctant to suggest changes at a successful company, thinking 'who am I to call for change at the great Pixar?' Notes Day broke that hesitancy by making participation not just permitted but expected.

Core principles

6 total
  1. Good ideas can come from anywhere; everyone must feel empowered to speak up
  2. There is no single big idea that solves complex interconnected problems; solutions emerge from many small contributions
  3. Shutting down production is itself a powerful signal that leadership values input over output
  4. Self-censoring is as dangerous as active suppression of ideas
  5. New crises test and demonstrate a company's values; the response to crisis bonds people and keeps culture current
  6. Fixing things is an ongoing incremental process, not a one-time event

Steps

5 steps
  1. Identify the interconnected problems honestly
    Before the event, leadership must candidly articulate the problems the organization faces. At Pixar, this meant openly discussing rising costs, external pressures, and the erosion of candor. The problems must be stated without spin so employees understand the real stakes.
  2. Open topic proposals to the entire organization
    Let employees at every level propose discussion topics and session ideas. Do not restrict proposals to management-approved subjects. The topics that employees want to discuss will reveal the real concerns that formal channels are failing to surface.
  3. Structure the day for productive dialogue
    Organize sessions in small enough groups that everyone can speak. Assign facilitators who are trained to draw out quiet voices and prevent dominant personalities from monopolizing discussion. Provide clear prompts and time structures to keep sessions focused and generative.
  4. Stop all production to signal genuine commitment
    The act of halting revenue-generating work for an entire day sends an unmistakable message that this is not a PR exercise. Every employee's time is valuable, and dedicating it entirely to collective problem-solving proves that leadership believes in the process.
  5. Act on the results and communicate what changed
    The most critical step is follow-through. If employees invest a day generating ideas and nothing changes, trust is destroyed. Leadership must review all recommendations, implement the viable ones, and clearly explain why others were not adopted. The feedback loop must close.

Examples

1 cases
Pixar's 2013 Notes Day

Pixar shut down all production for a full day in 2013. Every employee participated in small-group sessions addressing topics they themselves had proposed, ranging from reducing production costs to improving cross-departmental communication to rethinking how new hires were onboarded. Leadership attended as participants, not authorities. The event generated hundreds of concrete recommendations, many of which were implemented in the following months.

OutcomeNotes Day reinvigorated a culture that had been quietly stagnating. Employees who had been self-censoring started speaking up again. Several cost-reduction and process improvement ideas from the sessions were adopted and produced measurable results. The event demonstrated that collaboration, determination, and candor could solve problems that top-down mandates could not.

Common mistakes

2 traps
Running a Notes Day without genuine willingness to act on results
If the event is theater and leadership has already decided what to do, employees will detect this instantly. The result is worse than doing nothing: people become more cynical about the organization's stated values and even less likely to speak up in the future.
Assuming that an open-door policy is enough
Catmull discovered that despite Pixar's culture of openness, many employees were self-censoring. An open-door policy is passive; Notes Day was active. People who would never walk into the CEO's office with an idea will contribute when placed in a structured peer session with explicit permission and expectation to speak.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

In January 2013, Pixar's leadership gathered at Cavallo Point near the Golden Gate Bridge to discuss rising costs and cultural erosion. They realized that many employees had begun self-censoring, feeling it was not safe or welcome to offer differing ideas. The leadership team, about thirty-five directors and producers, decided that an all-company event would break the logjam. They called it Notes Day, a reference to the film industry practice of giving 'notes' (feedback), and structured it as an entire day where production stopped and every employee engaged in facilitated problem-solving sessions.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Creativity, Inc.
Ed Catmull & Amy Wallace · 2014
Open source →