COMMUNICATIONOngoing practice

Protective Use of Force

Use force to protect, not punish

Problem it solves

poor communication

Best for

Situations where force is necessary to protect life or individual rights

Not ideal for

Situations where punishment or retaliation is the primary goal

Overview

Why this framework exists

This framework involves using force to protect life or individual rights, while avoiding punishment or retaliation. It requires a clear understanding of the difference between protective and punitive uses of force.

Core principles

3 total
  1. The intention behind the use of force is to protect, not punish
  2. Force should only be used when necessary to protect life or individual rights
  3. Punishment or retaliation can lead to further conflict and harm

Steps

3 steps
  1. Assess the situation and determine the need for force
    Determine whether force is necessary to protect life or individual rights. Consider the potential consequences of using force.
    Pro tipUse empathy and active listening to understand the perspectives of all parties involved
    WarningBe aware of potential biases and power imbalances
  2. Use force in a way that is protective, not punitive
    Use force in a way that is protective, not punitive. Avoid using force as a means of punishment or retaliation.
    Pro tipFocus on the present moment and the need to protect, rather than on past conflicts or grievances
    WarningBe prepared for potential resistance or defensiveness
  3. Follow up with empathy and understanding
    Follow up with empathy and understanding, to help the parties involved to find a resolution and move forward.
    Pro tipUse open-ended questions to encourage feedback and discussion
    WarningBe aware of potential power imbalances and biases

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

1 cases
Protecting a child from harm

A child was running into the street, and a parent used force to grab the child and prevent harm. The parent's intention was to protect the child, not to punish.

OutcomeThe child was protected from harm, and the parent was able to find a way to teach the child about safety without using punishment

Common mistakes

2 traps
Confusing protective and punitive uses of force
Failing to distinguish between protective and punitive uses of force can lead to further conflict and harm
Using force as a means of punishment or retaliation
Using force as a means of punishment or retaliation can lead to further conflict and harm, and can undermine the protective use of force

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Marshall Rosenberg developed this approach as a way to resolve conflicts in situations where force may be necessary, using nonviolent communication principles.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life
Marshall B. Rosenberg · 2015
Open source →