STRATEGYMonths to result

Strategic Groups Framework

Grouping firms by strategy

Problem it solves

unclear strategic direction

Best for

Businesses looking to understand their competitive landscape

Not ideal for

Small businesses or startups with limited resources

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Strategic Groups Framework is a tool used to group firms within an industry based on their strategies. This framework helps to identify the different strategic positions of firms within an industry and understand how they compete with each other. By analyzing the strategic groups within an industry, businesses can better understand their competitive landscape and make informed decisions about their own strategy.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Firms within an industry can be grouped into strategic groups based on their strategies
  2. Strategic groups are protected by mobility barriers, which make it difficult for firms to change their strategic position
  3. The height and composition of mobility barriers vary across strategic groups, affecting the profitability of firms within each group

Steps

4 steps
  1. Identify Strategic Groups
    Identify the different strategic groups within an industry based on the strategies of firms. This involves analyzing the strategies of firms and grouping them into categories based on their similarities and differences.
    Pro tipUse a combination of qualitative and quantitative data to identify strategic groups
    WarningBe careful not to oversimplify the complexity of firms' strategies
  2. Assess Mobility Barriers
    Assess the height and composition of mobility barriers protecting each strategic group. This involves analyzing the factors that make it difficult for firms to change their strategic position, such as economies of scale, product differentiation, and capital requirements.
    Pro tipConsider the role of firm-specific assets and capabilities in creating mobility barriers
    WarningBe aware that mobility barriers can change over time due to changes in the industry or firm-specific factors
  3. Analyze Bargaining Power
    Analyze the relative bargaining power of each strategic group with its suppliers and buyers. This involves assessing the factors that affect the bargaining power of firms, such as their size, differentiation, and switching costs.
    Pro tipConsider the role of industry structure and market conditions in affecting bargaining power
    WarningBe aware that bargaining power can vary across different strategic groups
  4. Assess Threat of Substitutes
    Assess the relative position of each strategic group vis-à-vis substitute products. This involves analyzing the factors that affect the threat of substitutes, such as the availability of substitute products, their price and performance, and the switching costs of buyers.
    Pro tipConsider the role of industry trends and technological changes in affecting the threat of substitutes
    WarningBe aware that the threat of substitutes can vary across different strategic groups

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Hewlett-Packard (HP)

HP is in a strategic group in electronic calculators emphasizing high quality and technological leadership and focusing on the sophisticated user. This strategy limits HP's potential market share but exposes it to less price-sensitive and less powerful buyers than the firms competing with essentially standardized products in the mass market.

OutcomeHP's strategy has allowed it to maintain a strong market position and profitability despite intense competition in the industry
Sears

Sears is a large, broad-line, national department store chain that has a much greater volume of purchases and threat of backward integration as bargaining levers with suppliers relative to local, single-unit department stores.

OutcomeSears' strategy has allowed it to negotiate better prices with suppliers and maintain a strong market position

Common mistakes

3 traps
Oversimplifying Complexity
Oversimplifying the complexity of firms' strategies can lead to inaccurate identification of strategic groups and mobility barriers
Ignoring Industry Trends
Ignoring industry trends and technological changes can lead to inaccurate assessment of the threat of substitutes and mobility barriers
Failing to Consider Firm-Specific Factors
Failing to consider firm-specific factors, such as assets and capabilities, can lead to inaccurate assessment of mobility barriers and bargaining power

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The Strategic Groups Framework was developed by Michael E. Porter as a way to analyze the competitive landscape of an industry. Porter recognized that firms within an industry often have different strategies, and that these differences can affect their competitive position. By grouping firms into strategic groups, businesses can better understand the competitive dynamics of an industry and make informed decisions about their own strategy.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Competitive Strategy
Michael E. Porter · 1980
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Strategy →