LEADERSHIPCompounds over a hire's tenure; the intensity shows up immediately.85% confidence

Attitude Over Skills

Hire the attitude; the skills you can teach.

Problem it solves

Building a team that wins under pressure when polished résumés don't predict competitiveness.

Best for

Founders building high-intensity teams in competitive categories.

Not ideal for

Roles where credentialed expertise is the binding constraint and temperament is secondary.

Overview

Why this framework exists

Repole hires for attitude first because skills are teachable and attitude isn't. He screens for type-A, hyper-competitive 'sore losers' — often ex-athletes — using a deliberately provocative interview probe ('Do you like to lose?'). Candidates who give the political, self-help answer are passed over; the ones who flinch at the memory of a loss reveal the intensity he wants. The rule is explicitly 'attitude OVER skills,' not 'attitude, no skills.'

Core principles

4 total
  1. Skills are teachable; attitude is not — so select on the thing you can't install.
  2. Hire sore losers, not people who 'learned a lesson' from losing.
  3. Ex-athletes carry competitive intensity and team chemistry into business.
  4. Attitude over skills means BOTH — great attitude AND great skills, ranked in that order.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Repole describes interviewing a candidate at Vitaminwater 15 years earlier: he asked if she'd won a state championship, saw her face tighten, and she told him she lost the title 1-0 on the only goal she conceded all year. He hired her on that intensity; she is now CMO of a major company.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · VIDEO
Mike Repole on Next Up with Adam Breneman (full episode)
Next Up with Adam Breneman · 2025
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Leadership →