MARKETINGWeeks to result

Customer-Oriented Distribution Model

Match your distribution channel to your buyer type -- five channels for five distinct customer pr...

Problem it solves

weak market positioning

Best for

Sales and marketing leaders choosing or restructuring distribution channels for technology products crossing into the mainstream market.

Not ideal for

Consumer products sold through retail or companies with a single, well-established distribution channel.

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Customer-Oriented Distribution Model maps five distinct distribution channels to five buyer types, each with different purchasing behaviors, deal sizes, and support requirements. The five pairings are: (1) direct enterprise sales for the enterprise executive buyer -- high-touch, relationship-driven, large deals; (2) web-based self-service for the end-user buyer -- low-touch, try-before-you-buy, small transactions; (3) Sales 2.0 for the department manager buyer -- inside sales supported by web tools, mid-size deals; (4) traditional two-tier distribution for the design engineer buyer -- technical evaluation through distributors and resellers; (5) value-added resellers (VARs) for the small business owner -- local, trusted advisors who provide complete solutions.

The critical insight is that distribution channel choice is not a logistics decision -- it is a customer experience decision. Each buyer type expects to purchase through a specific channel, and using the wrong channel creates friction that prevents the sale. An enterprise executive expects face-to-face meetings and executive briefings. An end user expects to sign up online and start immediately. Forcing either through the other's channel guarantees failure.

For companies crossing the chasm, the distribution channel must match the buyer profile of the beachhead segment. This often requires building a new channel capability that did not exist in the early market, where direct sales to visionary executives was typically the only channel.

Core principles

4 total
  1. {"title":"Channel Must Match Buyer Type","description":"Each buyer type has a preferred way to evaluate, purchase, and receive support. Forcing them through a mismatched channel creates friction that prevents adoption regardless of product quality."}
  2. {"title":"Channel Economics Must Work","description":"Each channel has a different cost structure: direct sales is expensive per transaction, web self-service is cheap per transaction. The deal size must justify the channel cost. Selling $50/month subscriptions through enterprise sales reps is economically unsustainable."}
  3. {"title":"Channel Choice Affects Pricing Strategy","description":"Distribution channels impose pricing constraints. VARs need margins. Direct sales need deal sizes that justify high-touch engagement. Web self-service needs frictionless pricing. Your pricing must work within the economics of your chosen channel."}
  4. {"title":"Crossing the Chasm May Require Channel Change","description":"The early market channel (often direct sales to visionary executives) may not match the beachhead segment's buyer type. Be prepared to build or acquire a new channel capability for the crossing."}

Steps

4 steps
  1. Identify Your Beachhead Buyer Type
    Determine which of the five buyer types predominates in your beachhead segment: enterprise executive, end user, department manager, design engineer, or small business owner. This is driven by who has the budget and decision authority.
    Pro tipLook at how your beachhead buyers currently purchase the market alternative you are displacing. They will expect to purchase your product through a similar channel.
  2. Select the Matching Distribution Channel
    Match your buyer type to the appropriate channel. Enterprise executives require direct sales. End users require web self-service. Department managers require Sales 2.0 (inside sales plus web). Design engineers require two-tier distribution. Small business owners require VARs.
    WarningDo not select a channel based on what your sales organization already does. Select based on what your buyer expects. Build the channel capability you need, not the one you have.
  3. Align Pricing to Channel Economics
    Ensure your pricing model supports the channel economics. Calculate cost-per-transaction for the channel and ensure deal sizes provide adequate margins. Consider volume discounts, subscription models, or partner margins as needed.
    Pro tipWork backwards from channel economics: if VARs need 30-40% margins and your product costs $100, the end-user price must be at least $140-170. If that price is not competitive, the channel may not work.
  4. Build or Acquire Channel Capability
    If your current distribution capability does not match the required channel, invest in building it. This may mean hiring inside sales reps, building a web self-service platform, recruiting VAR partners, or establishing distributor relationships.
    Pro tipStart with a small number of channel partners and prove the model before scaling. One excellent VAR partner who understands your beachhead is better than twenty who do not.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Salesforce's Sales 2.0 Channel

Salesforce's beachhead targeted department managers (sales managers at mid-market companies), which matched the Sales 2.0 channel: inside sales reps supported by web demonstrations, free trials, and online onboarding. This was dramatically different from the enterprise direct sales channel used by Siebel, their market alternative.

OutcomeDemonstrated value
VMware's Direct Sales to Enterprise

After conquering the testing beachhead (which used web self-service and technical evaluation), VMware's expansion into production data center virtualization required direct enterprise sales to IT executives making strategic infrastructure decisions. They built the enterprise sales capability as they expanded up-market.

OutcomeDemonstrated value

Common mistakes

3 traps
Using Enterprise Sales for SMB Buyers
Enterprise sales reps cost $200K+ per year fully loaded. Small business deals cannot justify this cost. Forcing SMB buyers through enterprise sales creates deal sizes too small for the channel and sales processes too heavy for the buyer.
Using Self-Service for Enterprise Buyers
Enterprise executives expect relationship selling, executive briefings, and customized proposals. A self-service web portal that works perfectly for end users is completely inadequate for a $500K enterprise deal.
Ignoring Channel Partner Economics
Recruiting VARs or distributors without providing adequate margins, training, and support results in partners who list your product but do not actively sell it. Channel partners need economic motivation and competence to succeed.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

Moore developed this model because he observed that companies crossing the chasm often defaulted to their early market distribution channel -- direct sales to executive visionaries -- even when their beachhead segment required a completely different channel. A product targeting small business owners through enterprise sales reps, or targeting end users through VAR partners, would fail regardless of how good the product was.

The five-channel model codified the relationship between buyer types and their preferred purchasing experiences, giving companies a framework for making channel decisions based on customer behavior rather than internal sales organization preferences.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Crossing the Chasm, 3rd Edition Marketing and Selling
Geoffrey A. Moore
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Marketing →