INFLUENCEWeeks to result

Turning Toward Framework

Build emotional connection through small daily moments of responsiveness

Problem it solves

lack of influence

Best for

Couples who feel emotionally distant despite not having major conflicts or obvious problems

Not ideal for

Couples dealing with active crises like infidelity or addiction that require more targeted intervention

Overview

Why this framework exists

Gottman's third principle reveals that romance and passion are sustained not by grand gestures but by the accumulation of small daily moments where partners turn toward each other rather than away. Every day, partners make what Gottman calls bids for connection - small verbal or nonverbal attempts to engage, share, or connect. How the other partner responds to these bids determines the trajectory of the relationship.

A bid can be as simple as pointing out something interesting, asking a question, reaching for a hand, or making a comment about the day. The responding partner can turn toward the bid by engaging with it, turn away by ignoring it, or turn against it by responding with hostility. Research showed that couples who stayed together turned toward each other's bids 86 percent of the time, while those who divorced turned toward only 33 percent of the time.

This framework shifts attention from the dramatic moments of a relationship to the mundane ones, where the real emotional fabric is woven. It teaches partners to notice bids, recognize them for what they are, and respond with presence and engagement.

Core principles

5 total
  1. Relationships are built and maintained in small everyday moments, not grand gestures
  2. Every interaction is a bid for connection that can be turned toward or away from
  3. Couples who stay together turn toward each other's bids the vast majority of the time
  4. Turning toward builds an emotional bank account that sustains couples through hardship
  5. Small positive actions done consistently outweigh occasional large romantic gestures

Steps

4 steps
  1. Learn to Recognize Bids for Connection
    Start noticing the small ways your partner tries to connect throughout the day. A comment about the weather, a question about your opinion, a touch on the shoulder, showing you something on their phone - these are all bids. Many people miss bids because they do not recognize them as invitations to connect.
    Pro tipFor one week, try to count how many bids your partner makes in a day. Most people are surprised by how many they have been missing.
  2. Practice Turning Toward Consistently
    When you notice a bid, respond with engagement. Put down your phone, make eye contact, and show interest. You do not need to drop everything, but acknowledge the bid with genuine attention. Even a brief, warm response counts as turning toward.
    Pro tipIf you are busy, a simple 'That sounds interesting, tell me more in five minutes' is better than ignoring the bid entirely.
    WarningRepeatedly turning away from bids, even unintentionally, sends the message that your partner is not important to you.
  3. Initiate Your Own Bids
    Do not wait passively for your partner to make all the bids. Actively create moments of connection by sharing something from your day, asking about theirs, suggesting an activity together, or expressing affection. Increase the frequency of your own bids over time.
  4. Create Rituals of Connection
    Establish regular habits that naturally create opportunities for turning toward each other. This could be a morning coffee together, a brief check-in when you get home, or a walk after dinner. These rituals create predictable opportunities for connection that become the backbone of the relationship.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
The Power of 'We' Language

Gottman's research found that couples who referred to themselves as 'we' instead of 'I' were happier in their relationships. This simple linguistic habit reflected a deeper pattern of turning toward each other and seeing themselves as a unit rather than two separate individuals.

OutcomeCouples who naturally used 'we' language showed higher relationship satisfaction and greater resilience during conflicts, demonstrating how small habits of connection compound over time.
The 86 Percent Threshold

In his lab studies, Gottman found that couples who remained happily married turned toward each other's bids 86 percent of the time. Couples who eventually divorced only turned toward 33 percent of the time. The difference was not in how they handled major fights but in these small daily interactions.

OutcomeThis finding demonstrated that the quality of mundane daily interactions is a more powerful predictor of relationship success than how couples handle major disagreements.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Thinking only big gestures count
Many people believe that planning a fancy date or buying a gift is what sustains romance. While these are nice, Gottman's research shows that consistent small moments of engagement matter far more than occasional grand gestures.
Being distracted during bids
Phones, screens, and mental preoccupation are the biggest modern enemies of turning toward. A partner who is physically present but mentally absent is effectively turning away.
Keeping score of bids
Turning toward should not become a transactional exercise where you track who made more bids or who responded more. The goal is a natural rhythm of mutual engagement, not a ledger.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

In his observation lab, Gottman noticed that the small, seemingly insignificant interactions between couples predicted their long-term outcomes far better than how they handled major conflicts. Couples who were attentive to each other's small bids for connection built what Gottman described as an emotional bank account with a high balance, which gave them resilience during difficult times.

The insight emerged from coding thousands of micro-interactions and correlating response patterns with relationship outcomes years later. The data was clear: it was the everyday moments, not the big events, that made or broke relationships.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Unknown
John Gottman · 2000
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Influence →