MINDSETDays to result

Satisficing

Find good enough

Problem it solves

limiting beliefs

Best for

People who want to make efficient decisions

Not ideal for

People who want perfect solutions

Overview

Why this framework exists

Satisficing is a decision-making strategy that involves searching through available alternatives until an acceptability threshold is met. It's about finding a good enough solution rather than the perfect one. This approach can help individuals make efficient decisions and avoid getting stuck on unattainable solutions.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Good enough is, well, good enough.
  2. Perfect is the enemy of good.
  3. Efficient decisions are better than perfect ones.

Steps

4 steps
  1. Define the problem
    Clearly define the problem you're trying to solve. Avoid embedding solutions or biases into the problem statement.
    Pro tipUse radical honesty to examine your own biases.
    WarningBe careful not to get stuck on unattainable solutions.
  2. Brainstorm alternatives
    Generate a list of possible solutions to the problem. Consider multiple perspectives and alternatives.
    Pro tipUse a friend or colleague to help you brainstorm.
    WarningAvoid getting stuck on a single solution.
  3. Evaluate options
    Evaluate the options you've generated and sort them into 'best theoretical option' (BTO) and 'best doable option' (BDO) categories.
    Pro tipFocus on the BDOs and eliminate the BTOs.
    WarningDon't get too attached to a single solution.
  4. Pick a BDO
    Choose a BDO and execute it. Remember that the goal is to find a good enough solution, not a perfect one.
    Pro tipHave a bias to action and take the first step.
    WarningDon't overthink it – just take action.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
The kung pao chicken example

Bill Burnett uses the example of ordering kung pao chicken to illustrate the concept of satisficing. He notes that while there may be a perfect kung pao chicken out there, it's not necessary to find it in order to enjoy a good meal.

OutcomeA good enough solution is found and enjoyed.
The sailing example

Nathaniel wants to go sailing every weekend, but can't afford a boat. Instead of getting stuck on the solution of buying a boat, he reframes the problem as 'how can I go sailing regularly on my limited budget?' and finds alternative solutions.

OutcomeNathaniel finds a way to go sailing regularly without buying a boat.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Getting stuck on unattainable solutions
Focusing too much on the perfect solution can lead to analysis paralysis and inaction.
Not considering multiple perspectives
Failing to consider alternative perspectives can lead to a narrow and limited solution set.
Overthinking the decision
Spending too much time thinking about the decision can lead to indecision and inaction.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The concept of satisficing was introduced by Herbert Simon, a Nobel laureate in economics. It's a combination of the words'satisfy' and'suffice', and it's been widely used in economics and decision-making theory.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Designing Your Work Life
Bill Burnett · 2020
Open source →

Related frameworks

Browse all Mindset →