COMMUNICATIONWeeks to result

The Two Lists Framework

Separate what's wrong from what's right

Problem it solves

poor communication

Best for

Individuals seeking to improve their relationships and communication skills

Not ideal for

Those who are not open to feedback or self-reflection

Overview

Why this framework exists

The Two Lists Framework is a tool for separating what's wrong with feedback from what might be right or helpful. By making two lists, individuals can free themselves to see what might be valid or reasonable in the feedback, rather than getting defensive or dismissive. This framework is useful for improving relationships, communication skills, and personal growth.

Core principles

3 total
  1. Separate what's wrong from what's right to improve relationships and communication
  2. Use feedback as an opportunity for growth and self-awareness
  3. Be open to different perspectives and willing to learn from others

Steps

3 steps
  1. Make two lists
    Write down what's wrong with the feedback in one list and what might be right or helpful in another list.
    Pro tipUse a physical notebook or digital tool to make the lists, and be as specific as possible.
    WarningAvoid getting caught up in emotions or defensiveness when making the lists.
  2. Discuss the lists with a trusted friend or mentor
    Share the lists with someone you trust and ask for their feedback and insights.
    Pro tipChoose someone who is supportive and non-judgmental, and be open to their perspectives.
    WarningAvoid being defensive or dismissive of their feedback.
  3. Reflect on the feedback and identify areas for growth
    Use the lists to identify areas where you can improve and grow, and make a plan to work on those areas.
    Pro tipBe specific and actionable in your plan, and set realistic goals and deadlines.
    WarningAvoid being too hard on yourself or getting discouraged by setbacks.

Checklist

Saved in your browser

Examples

2 cases
Amy's story

Amy received feedback from her boss Ivan that she found offensive. With the help of her friend Hank, Amy used the Two Lists Framework to separate what was wrong with Ivan's approach from what might be right or helpful.

OutcomeAmy was able to see what might be valid or reasonable in the feedback and improve her relationship with Ivan.
Everett's story

Everett received a 360 report that he found confounding and defensive. However, he eventually saw the value in the feedback and used it to improve himself.

OutcomeEverett was able to improve his relationships and communication skills, and became a stronger leader.

Common mistakes

3 traps
Getting defensive or dismissive of feedback
When we receive feedback, it's natural to feel defensive or dismissive. However, this can prevent us from learning and growing from the feedback.
Not being open to different perspectives
Being open to different perspectives and willing to learn from others is crucial for personal growth and improvement.
Not taking action on the feedback
Receiving feedback is not enough; we must also take action on it to see real growth and improvement.

Origin story

How this framework came to be

The framework was introduced through the story of Amy, who received feedback from her boss Ivan that she found offensive. With the help of her friend Hank, Amy used the Two Lists Framework to separate what was wrong with Ivan's approach from what might be right or helpful.

Source

Traced to primary
Source · BOOK
Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well
Douglas Stone · 2014
Open source →